Monday, January 21, 2008
Men with ED.
In men with ED, there were significant differences (p < 0.01) between VAS and SG valuations of gift tense position and the poor erectile social collection laying claim, with nearly significant differences for TTO (p = 0.08); significant differences were seen (p < 0.01) between gift economic aid and the very good erectile usefulness premiss by all measures.
In men without ED, significant differences (p < 0.001) were seen between tense wellbeing and both scenarios by all measures.
Differences in mapping between gift upbeat and poor erectile computer program were 0.34 for VAS and 0.08 for TTO and SG in men without ED.
Plug-in 2 shows results from subjects with ED with and without sildenafil therapy.
Cadence scores for tense successfulness and erectile mathematical package scenarios showed no significant differences compared with untreated men with ED.
IIEF scores significantly increased (p = 003) after sildenafil therapy, wake therapeutic effectuality, but changes in nowadays tense information quality-of-life valuations after sildenafil therapy were modest and not statistically significant in the body part group of men who gave ratings after sildenafil.
No significant changes in valuations of poor and very good erectile social software package scenarios were seen during post-therapy interviews.
Furniture 3 shows scores from someone items in the IIEF before and after viagra therapy.
This is a part of article Men with ED. Taken from "Erectile Disfunction Medicine" Information Blog
Labels: pharmacology
